Clinical and histological predictive factors of reclassification of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Active surveillance (AS) has been established as a therapeutic strategy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Demographic and anatomopathological factors that increase the probability of reclassifying patients have been identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laboratory and histopathological data were collected from 116 patients included on AS since 2014. Univariate analysis was performed with Chi-square, t-student and Kendall's Tau, multivariate analysis according to logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 116 patients in AS, the median age at diagnosis was 66 years and the median follow-up was 13 months (2-72). Of these, 61 (52.6%) are still on surveillance, while 55 (47.4%) have left the program, mostly due to histological progression (52 patients (45.2%)); radical prostatectomy was performed in 27 (49.1%). Prostate volume (PV)≤60cc and the number of positive cylinders >1 in diagnostic biopsy (P=.05) were associated with higher reclassification rate in univariate analysis (P<.05). Multivariate analysis showed that these two variables significantly correlated with higher reclassification rate (PV 60 cc: OR 4.39, P=.04; >1 positive cylinder at diagnostic biopsy: OR 2.48, P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: It has been shown that initial ultrasound volume and the number of positive cylinders in the diagnostic biopsy are independent risk factors for reclassification. Initial PSA, laterality of the affected cylinders and PSA density were not predictive factors of progression in our series.

Factores clínicos e histológicos predictores de reclasificación en pacientes incluidos en programa de vigilancia activa de cáncer de próstata / Clinical and histological predictive factors of reclassification of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance

Introducción y objetivo La vigilancia activa (VA) se ha establecido como estrategia terapéutica en pacientes con cáncer de próstata de bajo riesgo. Se han identificado factores demográficos y anatomopatológicos que aumentan la probabilidad de reclasificar a los enfermos. Materiales y métodos Se han recogido datos analíticos e histopatológicos de 116 pacientes incluidos en VA desde 2014. Se ha realizado un análisis univariante con X2, t de Student y Tau de Kendall, un análisis multivariante según regresión logística y se han calculado las curvas de Kaplan-Meier. Resultados De los 116 pacientes en VA, la mediana de edad al diagnóstico fue 66 años y la mediana de seguimiento fueron 13 meses (2-72). De todos ellos, 61 (52,6%) siguen en vigilancia mientras que 55 (47,4%) han salido del programa, la mayoría por progresión histológica (52 pacientes [45,2%]), realizándose prostatectomía radical en 27 (49,1%). El volumen prostático (Vp) ≤ 60cc y el número de cilindros positivos >1 en la biopsia diagnóstica (p = 0,05) se asociaron con mayor tasa de reclasificación en el análisis univariante (p < 0,05). En el análisis multivariante, estas dos variables se correlacionaron significativamente con una mayor tasa de reclasificación (Vp ≤ 60 cc: OR 4,39, p = 0,04; >1 cilindro positivo en la biopsia diagnóstica: OR 2,48, p = 0,03). Conclusiones Se ha objetivado que el volumen ecográfico inicial y el número de cilindros positivos en la biopsia diagnóstica son factores de riesgo independientes para la reclasificación. El antígeno prostático específico (PSA) inicial, la lateralidad de los cilindros afectos y la densidad de PSA no fueron elementos predictores de progresión en nuestra serie (AU)

Introduction and Objective Active surveillance (AS) has been established as a therapeutic strategy in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Demographic and anatomopathological factors that increase the probability of reclassifying patients have been identified. Materials and Methods Laboratory and histopathological data were collected from 116 patients included on AS since 2014. Univariate analysis was performed with Chi-square, t-student and Kendall's Tau, multivariate analysis according to logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated. Results Of the 116 patients in AS, the median age at diagnosis was 66 years and the median follow-up was 13 months (2-72). Of these, 61 (52.6%) are still on surveillance, while 55 (47.4%) have left the program, mostly due to histological progression (52 patients (45.2%)); radical prostatectomy was performed in 27 (49.1%). Prostate volume (PV) ≤ 60cc and the number of positive cylinders > 1 in diagnostic biopsy (p = 0.05) were associated with higher reclassification rate in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that these two variables significantly correlated with higher reclassification rate (PV 60 cc: OR 4.39, p = 0.04; > 1 positive cylinder at diagnostic biopsy: OR 2.48, p = 0.03). Conclusions It has been shown that initial ultrasound volume and the number of positive cylinders in the diagnostic biopsy are independent risk factors for reclassification. Initial PSA, laterality of the affected cylinders and PSA density were not predictive factors of progression in our series (AU)

Desarrollo e implementación de una unidad de inmunoterapia en un servicio de urología / Development and implementation of an immunotherapy unit in a urology department

Introducción La inmunoterapia está revolucionando el tratamiento del cáncer, siendo los anticuerpos monoclonales dirigidos contra moléculas reguladoras del punto de control la terapia más ampliamente utilizada en la actualidad. Un total de seis fármacos inhibidores del punto de control inmunitario (CPI) han sido aprobados por la U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) y por la European Medicines Agency (EMA) para su uso en diversos tumores sólidos del aparato genitourinario. Material y métodos Se revisó la literatura y se analizó la metodología y experiencia propia adquirida para instaurar el tratamiento con CPI en un servicio de Urología. Resultados Se describen los requisitos recomendables desde el punto de vista formativo, logístico y procedimental para implementar una unidad de inmunoterapia en un servicio de Urología que permita ofrecer con seguridad el tratamiento experto con CPI a los pacientes con tumores genitourinarios. Conclusiones El cumplimiento del programa propuesto garantiza la administración segura de CPI en un entorno hospitalario (AU)

Introduction Immunotherapy is revolutionizing cancer treatment, with monoclonal antibodies directed against checkpoint regulatory molecules currently being the most widely used therapy. A total of six immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) drugs have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for use in various solid tumors of the genitourinary tract. Material and methods the literature is reviewed and the methodology, as well as our own experience, are analyzed to establish treatment with CPI in a urology department. Results The requirements recommended in terms of training, logistics and procedure are described in order to safely offer expert treatment with CPI to patients with genitourinary tumors. Conclusions Compliance with the proposed program ensures safe administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors in a hospital setting (AU)

Development and implementation of an immunotherapy unit in a urology department.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy is revolutionizing cancer treatment, with monoclonal antibodies directed against checkpoint regulatory molecules currently being the most widely used therapy. A total of six immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) drugs have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for use in various solid tumors of the genitourinary tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The literature is reviewed and the methodology, as well as our own experience, are analyzed to establish treatment with CPIs in a urology department. RESULTS: The requirements recommended in terms of training, logistics and procedure are described in order to safely offer expert treatment with CPIs to patients with genitourinary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the proposed program ensures safe administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors in a hospital setting.